<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone: No, we do need a real programming model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/</link>
	<description>Software Development Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hackerdude</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-44343</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackerdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-44343</guid>
		<description>and now we have an sdk. Wee!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and now we have an sdk. Wee!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-32308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-32308</guid>
		<description>My trusty (rusty, crusty, pick your favorite) treo looks better and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trusty (rusty, crusty, pick your favorite) treo looks better and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-31254</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-31254</guid>
		<description>I agree. I also think that their intent will be revealed within the next few days here, with the 1.1.1 update that's pending. If it locks it out as seriously as the iPod Touch, I think Apple will have decided at least for the time being that it's a closed platform (think iPod games in terms of the relationship between developers and Apple). However, if they leave it open-ish as it is today, I think they are planning to fully support it at some point. My money, sadly, is that they'll lock it down.

Or I could be totally wrong, and it could just be some hardware refinements that allow them to lock the touch so effectively, that just aren't feasible on the current rev of the iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I also think that their intent will be revealed within the next few days here, with the 1.1.1 update that&#8217;s pending. If it locks it out as seriously as the iPod Touch, I think Apple will have decided at least for the time being that it&#8217;s a closed platform (think iPod games in terms of the relationship between developers and Apple). However, if they leave it open-ish as it is today, I think they are planning to fully support it at some point. My money, sadly, is that they&#8217;ll lock it down.</p>
<p>Or I could be totally wrong, and it could just be some hardware refinements that allow them to lock the touch so effectively, that just aren&#8217;t feasible on the current rev of the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
