<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone: No, we do need a real programming model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/</link>
	<description>Software Development Blog by David Martinez</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 16:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hackerdude</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/comment-page-1/#comment-98301</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackerdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-98301</guid>
		<description>and now we have an sdk. Wee!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and now we have an sdk. Wee!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/comment-page-1/#comment-98300</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-98300</guid>
		<description>My trusty (rusty, crusty, pick your favorite) treo looks better and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trusty (rusty, crusty, pick your favorite) treo looks better and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/comment-page-1/#comment-98299</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackerdude.com/2007/09/27/iphone-no-we-do-need-a-real-programming-model/#comment-98299</guid>
		<description>I agree. I also think that their intent will be revealed within the next few days here, with the 1.1.1 update that&#039;s pending. If it locks it out as seriously as the iPod Touch, I think Apple will have decided at least for the time being that it&#039;s a closed platform (think iPod games in terms of the relationship between developers and Apple). However, if they leave it open-ish as it is today, I think they are planning to fully support it at some point. My money, sadly, is that they&#039;ll lock it down.

Or I could be totally wrong, and it could just be some hardware refinements that allow them to lock the touch so effectively, that just aren&#039;t feasible on the current rev of the iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I also think that their intent will be revealed within the next few days here, with the 1.1.1 update that&#8217;s pending. If it locks it out as seriously as the iPod Touch, I think Apple will have decided at least for the time being that it&#8217;s a closed platform (think iPod games in terms of the relationship between developers and Apple). However, if they leave it open-ish as it is today, I think they are planning to fully support it at some point. My money, sadly, is that they&#8217;ll lock it down.</p>
<p>Or I could be totally wrong, and it could just be some hardware refinements that allow them to lock the touch so effectively, that just aren&#8217;t feasible on the current rev of the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
